Thursday, 24 October 2019

Tacitus Annals on Actium 1.1-2.1

What does he imply about Augustus' role at Actium?

  • It was Augustus' means of gaining power - "he faced no opposition since the bravest souls had either died in battle or fallen victim to proscription"
  • "he seduced the soldiers with gifts, the people with corn and everyone with the delights of peace"
  • The word seduced implies manipulation
  • "he gradually increased his power, arrogating to himself the functions of the Senate, the magistrates and the law"
In what ways is his writing different/similar to that of the poets?
  • He doesn't glorify Augustus or the battle like the poets do
  • The civil war element is emphasised, along with Augustus' use of the battle to cement his own power and rid himself of opposition
  • He focuses more on the aftermath of Actium, rather than the battle itself
  • Shows the sycophantic attitude of society - "the surviving nobles enjoyed a wealth and status that increased in proportion to their servility"
  • "and having profited by the revolution, they preferred the present safety to the insecurity of the past"
What does he fail to mention about Actium?
  • There is no mention of Cleopatra
  • No mention of Agrippa
  • He doesn't actually say what happened at the battle
  • The consequences of the battle are not mentioned

No comments:

Post a Comment