Tuesday, 1 December 2020

Vespasian's Support

Political Support
Tacitus
  • Mucianus - the governor of Syria - "he would rather make an emperor than be one" 
  • Whilst Vespasian was a gregarious soldier and commander, Mucianus by contrast was a shrewd politician - the two of them together made the perfect emperor - "the combined virtue of these two would have comprised of a remarkable degree of qualities demanded of an emperor"
  • Mucianus could command "influence on his subordinates, associates and colleagues" and he acted "more as Vespasian's colleague than his subordinate"
  • Mucianus "was an expert at manipulation of a given political situation"
  • At the start of the civil war they were "divided by jealousy" but over the years had been in contact, and Titus "managed to remove petty friction by an appeal to their common interests" - when Nero died this "healed the breach" and both became collaborators rather than rivals
  • Tiberious Alexander - the provincial governor of Egypt - an equestrian. He got his legions to swear loyalty to Vespasian from Egypt on the 1st of July 69 AD, this was so important that Vespasian marked this as the first day of his emperorship
Provincial Support
Tacitus
  • Egypt:
    • It was the main exporter of grain to Rome
    • Hard to enter by land and has no good harbours along the coast
    • Divided politically and indifferent to law
    • This is where Vespasian spends his time during the civil war
  • The armies of  Judaea had taken an oath to Vespasian on the 3rd of July
Josephus
  • Vespasian's plan was to take Alexandra, combine the two legions in Egypt with his own, and use the grain supply of Egypt to put pressure on Vitellius
  • The legions of Judaea spontaneously swore allegiance - Vespasian himself was not interested in being emperor "he preferred the safety of a private life to the dangers of high office" - but Mucianus and the other high officers encouraged him until he was convinced
  • Evaluation - perhaps Josephus presents Vespasian as the reluctant emperor to give him more legitimacy
  • Revolt on Pontus (northern Turkey) from Anicetus - an associate of the last king of Pontus. He took advantage of the situation to revolt, but one of Vespasian's deputies Virdius Geminus was sent into the province and put down the revolt - "everywhere, the tide now seemed to be turning in Vespasian's favour beyond his wildest dreams"
Military Support
Tacitus
  • Egypt offered two legions, Judaea had three legions, Syria offered four legions
Josephus
  • On the soldiers in Judaea: they realised their strength - three legions in Judaea, and other auxiliaries from the neighbouring kings, but also the support of all the armies in the east and also those of Europe
  • They contrast the tyrannical behaviour of Vitellius with the kindly Vespasian - "lustful emperor vs a disciplined man", "barbaric tyrant vs a kindly leader", a "childless man over a father" - the legitimate succession of princes "is the most certain guarantee of peace"
  • Flavius Sabinus - will bring a distinguished number of young men and has already been entrusted with the government of the city
Suetonius
  • Surprisingly the legions of Moesia and Pannonia made a bid for Vespasian
  • 2,000 soldiers in Moesia had planned to assist Otho in the civil war with Vitellius, but had arrived too late and so they had decided to find another emperor to support
  • They made a list of all the provincial governors in the empire, weighing up the pros and cons of each - eventually they reached Vespasian, and on the recommendation of some soldiers from the Syrian legions they spontaneously made their support known. They then convinced the other legions in Moesia and Pannonia to support him as well
  • They made their march into Italy under the Flavian banners
  • Auxiliaries were also drafted in from the local client kingdoms, Armenia supplied archers and cavalry

Vitellius and Vespasian: The End of the Civil War

 Vitellius' Arrival in Rome

  • Vitellius arrived in Rome on 17th July, 69 AD
  • His six-month reign would be characterised by dissent, mutiny and uncertainty
  • Both Suetonius and Tacitus vilify Vitellius:
    • "he was ignorant of all law, human and divine" - Tacitus
Vitellius' Emperorship
  • Vitellius' shortcomings as emperor would only serve to strengthen Vespasian's cause and bolster his popularity
Read Tacitus 2.90-91 and Suetonius, Vitellius, 10-12
List:
  • The titles and powers assumed by Vitellius
  • His attitude towards the Senate, Praetorians and people
  • His failures as emperor according to Tacitus and Suetonius
Military Moves 1
  • Vitellius consciously ignored the threat from Vespasian until September of 69 AD when Vespasian's forces began their invasion of Italy
  • Vitellius' deputy Caecina was sent north with the Germanic legions. However their long stay in Rome had made them disorganised and ill-disciplined
  • Worse still, Caecina planned to betray Vitellius and join with the fleet commander at Ravenna in deserting to Vespasian's cause
"Historians of this war who wrote during the Flavian dynasty have flatteringly described the motives of these men as "concern for peace" and "patriotism". My own view is that in addition to a natural instability of character and the cheapening of loyalty which was a consequence of their betrayal of Galba, a jealous fear that rivals would outpace them in Vitellius' affections induced them to ruin Vitellius himself" - Tacitus 2.101

Military Moves 2
  • When Caecina attempted to switch sides, his own legions refused to follow his command and put him in chains
  • Vitellius' other deputy, Valens, was sent north to deal with the situation
  • During this confusion the legions on the Danube had marched into Italy under Marcus Antonius Primus, who was acting independently from the main Flavian forces
  • The two opposing forces met near the city of Cremona in Northern Italy
Battle of Cremona
  • The two forces were evenly matched, though since Valens had not yet arrived the Vitellian forces were without a leader
  • Fighting was heavy, and lasted through the night with significant losses on both sides
  • However, when the sun rose the third legion (Flavian), who had served in Syria, had adopted a local custom of turning east and saluting the rising sun
  • When the Vitellian legions saw this, they assumed their enemy were welcoming fresh reinforcements, and so lost the stomach for fighting and fled
  • The Vitellius camp was captured, and Antonius then besieged and destroyed Cremona itself, leaving Rome open to assault
Chaos in Rome
  • Antonius began a steady march towards Rome, but since he had not been instructed by Mucianus or Vespasian his motives were in question
  • Valens travelled to Gaul in a bid to find support for Vitellius, but he was captured and executed
  • In Rome itself, clashes sparked between Vitellius and Flavian supporters, led by Flavius Sabinus, Vespasian's brother. Vespasian's son, Domitian, was also living in Rome with his uncle and was in great danger
  • Violence continued over the coming months as Vitellius and Flavius Sabinus attempted negotiations. In one clash, the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, Rome's most sacred temple, was burned to the ground, and Sabinus was killed
The Storming of Rome
Suetonius, Vitellius, 15
  • What did Vitellius promise the people of Rome once he had heard of the revolt of Vespasian?
    • Vitellius promised any volunteer who joined the army full-service pay and pensions. He also used "limitless spending" for private and public generosity
  • Who did Vitellius try to bargain with? what was promised to him and why did this bargain fail?
    • Tried to negotiate with Sabinus, Vespasian´s brother ' but when he announced his resignation the soldiers demanded he "take heart" and remain firm, and not accept the offer
  • What actions did Vitellius take against the Flavians inside the city?
    • Vitellius rejected the offer - he attacked Sabinus, drove the Flavian supporters onto the Capitoline Hill, trapped them in the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, and then burned them alive
Tacitus, 3.84-86
  • What happened to the Praetorians [Vitellians] once Rome was stormed by Vespasian's forces?
    • The Praetorians were wiped out in the fighting, fighting for Vitellius
  • What was the fate of Vitellius?
    • Vitellius was caught fleeing the palace by the Flavian soldiers. They dragged him to the Gemonian Steps near the Forum and he was killed by the Flavian soldiers. When one of the soldiers mocked him his last words were "but I was still once your emperor" - Tacitus saus this was "noble" even though the rest of his reign had been rather ignoble!
  • What happened to Domitian?
    • Domitian had been in hiding throughout the civil war, fearing for his life. Now that Vespasian's forces had won he came out of hiding to greet the soldiers. He was hailed as "Imperator" and "Caesar" and taken to the palace - thus began the Flavian dynasty

Thursday, 19 November 2020

Vespasian: Background: Suetonius, Vespasian, 1-5

  1. Who did Titus Flavius Petro fight for during the Civil War (Julius Caesar vs Pompey)? What job did he take up after his military service?
    1. Pompey, after Pharsalus he earned an honourable discharge and became a tax-collector
  2. During whose reign was Vespasian born?
    1. Augustus - 5 years before his death
  3. Who brought Vespasian up as a child? How did he honour this person throughout his life?
    1. His grandmother, Tertulla. He preserved her estate, including his childhood room, and drank from a silver cup that belonged to her
  4. Who convinced Vespasian to take up a Senatorial career?
    1. His mother, Vespasia Pollio - she used to call him "your brother's footman"
  5. List the positions Vespasian held during his Senatorial career (Suet, 2)
    1. Military tribune in Thrace
    2. Quaestor in Crete and Cyrenaica
    3. First attempt at aedileship came to nothing
    4. Second scraped through in sixth place
    5. Praetorship - one of the popular choices - during Gaius' reign where he acted as a flatter
  6. Who did Vespasian marry? How many children did they have? What were their names?
    1. Flavia Domitilla
    2. 3
    3. Titus, Domitian, Domitilla
  7. What post did Vespasian hold during Claudius' reign? Who was he indebted to?
    1. Was given command of a legion in Germany and Britain - fought in thirty battles, subjugated two tribes and captured the island of Vectis (Isle of Wight)
    2. Narcissus
  8. Who did Vespasian fear during Nero's reign and why?
    1. Agrippina, for her animosity towards Narcissus (who Vespasian was indebted to)
  9. What province was Vespasian assigned to? What type of a governor was he known as and what nickname did he earn?
    1. Africa
    2. Rule characterised by justice and dignity - he came back no richer than he went and had to mortgage his estates to go into trade
    3. "Mule Driver"
  10. Why was Vespasian dismissed from the Imperial Court during Nero's reign?
    1. During Nero's tour of Achaia (Greece) he would either leave during Nero's musical recitals or fall asleep
  11. What ancient superstition was at that time circulating in the East? Which group thought it was about them?
    1. That the rulers of the world would come from the east - The Jews thought this referred to them, it actually meant Roman emperors
  12. Who was sent to subdue the Jewish revolt? Who was also taken to serve on his staff?
    1. Vespasian, who took his eldest son Titus with him
  13. How did Vespasian's grandmother react to an omen from an ancient oak tree that Vespasian would one day be emperor?
    1. Mocked it: "Fancy your going soft in the head before your old mother does!"
  14. How did Gaius punish Vespasian for neglecting his job as a street cleaner? How was this interpreted?
    1. He had soldiers load Vespasian's toga with mud - was taken as a sign that one day the soil of Italy would be trampled by Civil War, and Vespasian would protect it in his bosom
  15. What did the god Carmel promise Vespasian? (Carmel is the Jewish Gid - Mount Carmel was a sacred site in Judaea)
    1. He would never be disappointed in what he desired, no matter how lofty his ambitions
  16. Which distinguished Jewish prisoner proclaimed he would one day be emperor
    1. Flavius Josephus (as in THE Josephus)







Friday, 13 November 2020

Otho and the Challenge of Vitellius

 Otho Becomes Emperor, Immediate Challenges

  • Otho, despite the success of is coup, was faced with immediate challenges to his position
  • In particular, one Aulus Vitellius, commander of the legions of Lower Germany, also harboured imperial ambition
  • In late 68 AD, Vitellius had been sent by Galba to take up the position of governor of the lower Rhine region, a position left vacant by the execution of Fonteius Capito
  • "Galba had openly stated that a glutton was the sort of rival whom he feared least, and he expected Vitellius to cram his belly with the fruits of the province" - Suetonius, Vitellius,7
  • Galba had once again failed to appreciate his own popularity, and the ambitions of others
The Backstory: Insurrections in Germany during Galba's reign
  • Galba's unpopularity began to stir insurrections in Germany, bolstered in particular by two officers, Fabius Valens and Caecina Alienus, who held a personal enmity towards Galba
  • On 1st January 69AD, when Galba was being sworn in as Consul, the legions at Mainz in Germany refused to recognise Galba as emperor
Suetonius, Vitellius, 8
Tacitus, 1.62
  1. What titles did Vitellius accept from the soldiers, which did he reject? Why do you think this may be?
    • Suetonius + Tacitus - assumed the title "Germanicus" - in order to reap some of the popularity in Germany with the association - "Conqueror of Germany"
    • Suetonius - hesitated to accept "Augustus" - a lot to live up to
    • Suetonius + Tacitus - refused emphatically "Caesar" - perhaps the name had become sullied from the days of Caligula and Nero - because he was going to march on Rome he wouldn't want to remind people of the similarities between him and Caesar
  2. What can we learn of Vitellius as an individual?
    • Tacitus - gluttonous - ready to accept the privileges of emperor - spent his time in "idle pleasures and sumptuous banquets"
    • Suetonius - he cancelled all punishments of the soldiers, regardless of crime. Shrewd? Spineless? Lazy?
  3. Why does Vitellius seem to be so popular with the soldiers of his army?
    • Suetonius - his lack of discipline contrasts favourably with Galba. One speech he gave when his camp burnt down - "courage my men - light is given us"
      • positive/optimistic
      • he gives few speeches maybe because he understands not to get too involved in the soldiers' affairs
    • Tacitus - The soldiers acted independent of their commander - they realised they had to act fast to secure victory
      • Their keenness to act made them carry out their duties without Vitellius' direction
A Confusing Situation in Rome, January 69 AD
There was now a very confusing political situation in Rome during this period:
  1. There was an incumbent emperor in Rome, Galba
  2. An open revolt from a usurper in Germany - Vitellius
  3. A would-be assassin, Otho
Tacitus gives us a rather damning impression of the latter two:
"Here then were the two most despicable men in the whole world by reason of their unclean, idle and pleasure-loving lives, apparently appointed by fate for the task of destroying the empire" (1.50)
After Otho's coup, he was sworn in as emperor on 16th January, 69 AD
Suetonius, Otho, 7 - Who does Otho model himself on? What problems will this cause him?

Otho and Vitellius
After Galba's death, there were now two claimants to the imperial throne, Otho ruling as usurper-emperor in Rome, and Vitellius as rebel emperor in Germany
Suetonius, Otho, 8
Tacitus, 1.74-78
  1. List the ways in which Otho and Vitellius tried to undermine each other and enhance their own positions
    • Otho
      • Tacitus:
        • Kept up a "lively correspondence" with Vitellius, offering bribes of money, indfluence and a life of indulgence
        • They accused each other of debauchery "here at least both were right"
        • Shared a consulship with Verginius - the former governor of Germany, other appointments were left untouched
      • Suetonius:
        • Otho sent an imperial dispatch to Germany ordring the legions to stand down, but the deputation joined with Vitellius and betrayed Otho
        • He "contemplated some ceremony to honour Nero in order to entice the mob" who called him "Nero Otho"
    • Vitellius
      • Tacitus:
        • "Similar bouts" were offered by Vitellius
        • Vitellius' deputy Valens sent a message to the praetorians boasting of the strengths of the Germanic legions and trying to intimidate them - "outclassed in a military sense they remained inflexibly loyal"
        • Vitellius sent a letter to Otho's brother, threatening to kill him if any harm came to Vitellius' family in Rome - both families survived
        • Assassins were sent by Otho to Germany and Vitellius to Rome - "both parties failed to achieve anything"
        • Vitellius was compelled to fight for the throne, Otho "went on with his imperial duties as if there were not a cloud in the sky"
  2. List the provinces that swore loyalty to Otho, and those who swore loyalty to Vitellius?
    • Otho
      • Dalmatia, Pannonia, Moesia
      • Distant and oversea provinces "remained loyal"
      • Vespasian and Mucianus had Judaea and Syria swear fealty
      • Egypt and Africa expressed "nominal" support
    • Vitellius
      • Spain had "gone over" to Vitellius
      • Narbonese rallied to Vitellius
      • Legions of Germany
  3. Who, in your view, seems to be in the better position? Why?
War in Italy
  • Vitellius, guided by Valens and Caecina, sent legions towards the capital in preparation for the inevitable military struggle to come with Otho
  • The Senate, ever subservient, were not sure how they would survive such political uncertainty - who did they need to brown - nose?
    • "For the senate it was a task of steering between Scylla and Charybdis" - Tacitus
  • Due to the speed of Valens and Caecina's march, Otho could not rely on support from the provincial legions in Pannonia and Dalmatia to prevent Vitellius' advance
  • Otho realised the strategic importance of ensuring Valens and Caecina's armies were kept divided - they had advanced through two separate passes in the Alps - and so marched with 25,000 men to Cremona (northern Italy)
  • Valens had 40,000 men, Caecina 30,000, and so Otho was drastically outnumbered should their armies combine
Initial Moves
  • Otho enjoyed some early successes:
    • Placentia was successfully defended by Otho's deputy Spurinna against Caecina
    • Caecina also failed to execute an ambush on Otho's troops along the Via Postumia (through northern Italy)
  • However, despite these successes, Otho ultimately failed to stop the uniting of Valens and Caecina's armies
  • The decision now needed to be made: engage Vitellius' forces immediately or delay in the hope that the legions from Pannonia could reach Italy in time
The First Battle of Bedriacum, 14th April 69 AD
  • The decision was ultimately made to confront the Vitellian forces, which culminated in a battle near Bedriacum in North-Central Italy
  • Unsurprisingly, the vastly outnumbered Othonian forces were defeated, which included the as-yet untried Praetorian Guard (good at killing emperors, clearly not good at actual fighting)
Suetonius, Otho, 9-12 (first two questions)
Tacitus, Histories, 1.86, 1.89 (last question)
  1. Why did Otho decide upon fighting Vitellius?
    • Suetonius
      • Perhaps he suffered from nervousness?
      • Perhaps he wished to engage Vitellius' forces before he arrived?
      • Perhaps he could not control the "offensive spirit" of his troops?
      • Perhaps due to Vitellius' supplies running low?
      • There were talks of an armistice, and Otho's troops were beginning to fraternise with the enemy - fears his soldiers may change sides?
  2. What did Otho do after his defeat? How did this reflect on his reputation?
    • Suetonius
      • "Immediately" decided upon suicide - even though he could've retreated to the provinces that had sworn him loyalty
      • He did not want to risk the lives of the city of Rome, nor cause any more bloodshed for his troops
      • "thus many who had hated Otho loved him for the way he died"
      • He also burned any documents that could incriminate others to Vitellius, and did not punish any deserters
  3. What effect did the war between Otho and Vitellius have on Rome itself?
    • Tacitus
      • Rising cost of food - a famine breaks out
      • Tiber flooded and caused devastation
      • One of the bridges on the Tiber had collapsed
      • Unemployment
      • Tenement blocks began to collapse
The Nature of Vitellius' Emperorship
  • After Otho's suicide, the Senate proclaimed Vitellius emperor and bestowed the imperial titles onto him
  • Technically this made Vitellius emperor, though it should be noted that many regions of the empire never actually swore allegiance to Vitellius during his brief reign
  • Both Tacitus and Suetonius give us a rather damning account of Vitellius' character, perhaps influenced by the fact that he was the emperor defeated by the Flavians, and so it was in their interests to vilify his character
Side note - Otho based himself on Nero

Suetonius, Vitellius, 10-12
Tacitus, Histories, 2.90-91
Make notes on the character of Vitellius and the nature of his leadership according to the sources
  • Suetonius:
    • Power hungry - consulship for life
    • Lacks respect for the traditions/position of the senate
      • makes all political appointments ten years in advance
    • His march on Rome in military dress suggests he doesn't respect tradition/political norms
    • When his soldiers began committing all sorts of crimes, Vitellius laughed them off
    • "Only one thing smells sweeter than a dead enemy, a dead fellow citizen" - has no regard for his fellow countrymen
    • He mocks Otho's humble grave "he deserved this type of Mausoleum" and looted the dagger Otho had used to kill himself, dedicating it to the temple of Mars
    • He based important decisions on what performers in the theatre told him
    • He made his freedman and lover Asiaticus into an Equestrian
    • He spent his time in lavish banquets and festivals - more enjoys the privileges than the responsibilities
  • Tacitus
    • "typical of his ignorance of all law, human and divine"
    • "His administration seemed to operate in an atmosphere of carouse" (drunken revelry)
    • He attended the games as a punter rather than an emperor
    • He attended every Senate meeting, no matter how trivial
    • He particularly argued with Helvidius Priscus and the courtiers had to calm him down. Then he would boast about his opposition to Thrasea Patus (the guy who walked out on Nero)
      • the Senate sneered at his comparison with such a distinguished senator

Thursday, 8 October 2020

Year of the Four Emperors 68-9 AD

Aftermath of the Death of Nero
  • Nero, tyrant of the Roman world, was dead
  • This should have been a cause for celebration, but - as in all cases of political upheaval - strife quickly arose between different factions in Rome...
  • Tacitus [Histories, 1.2] gives us his impression of the period:
    • "I am entering on the history of a period rich in disasters, frightened in its wars, torn by civil strife, and even in peace full of horrors."
  • Generals in the provinces, seeing Nero fall at the hands of Galba and the Senate, began to comprehend a new reality about the Roman world:
    • "for now had been divulged that secret of the empure, that emperors could be made elsewhere than at Rome" - [Tac, Hist, 1.4]
  • So begins the "Year of the Four Emperors", the first civil war since the days of Augustus...
Galba's Bid for Power
  • When Gaius Julius Vindex' revolt had failed in Gaul at the battle of Vesontio, Galba's bid for power may have seemed tenuous
  • However, news was quickly brought to him that the Praetorian Guard and Senate had abandoned Nero and proclaimed for Galba
  • Trusting also in support from the government of Lusitania (Portugal), Otho, Galba set out for Rome at the beginning of July 68 AD
  • However, Galba placed too much trust in the Senate's support to seize power, assuming that the support from this group alone would be enough to guarantee his position
  • Moreover, his old fashioned discipline was at odds with the army at this time, whose generals tended to be more good-humoured and indulgent
Nero's Death: Rome's Reaction
Tacitus gives us a useful summary of the reactions of different areas of the empire to the death of Nero and accession of Galba:
Tacitus, the Histories:
  • 1.4.5 - Reactions in Rome - How did different groups react to Nero's death?
    • "The death of Nero had been welcomed initially by a surge of relief"
      • However, it also evoked a variety of emotions in the Senate, the populace and the garrison of the capital, as well as in all the many legions and legionary commanders
    • "A well hidden secret of the Principate had been revealed: it was possible, it seemed, for am emperor to be chosen outside of Rome"
    • The Senators were delighted and "promptly permitted themselves considerable freedom of speech in their negotiations with an emperor who was new to his task and absent from the capital"
    • "The leading members of the equestrian order were hardly less gratified than the Senators"
    • "Hopes were raised among respectable middle-class Romans who had ties of duty towards the great families, as among the dependents and freedmen of condemned persons and exile"
    • "The riff-raff haunting the circus and theatres, and the scum of the slave population, or those spendthrifts and bankrupts who had been the recipients of Nero's degrading charity were filled with gloom and hungry for the latest rumours"
    • "The city garrison...had a long tradition of sworn allegiance to the Caesars, and had been induced to desert Nero more by cunning and suggestion than from any inclination of its own"
      • The bounty promised for deserting Nero was refused "I select my troops, I do not buy them"
  • 1.8-10 - Reactions in the Empire - How did each province react to Nero's death?
    • Britain
      • Had no hard feelings towards Galba - had learned to keep their hatred for the enemy
    • Spain
      • Governed by Cluvius Rufus - "tried in the arts of peace, untried in war" - not a competent military general
    • Africa
      • Clodius Macer - terrible governor, executed by Galba - the people were "content with any kind of emperor" because he was so bad
    • Germany
      • Was of the most important (and the biggest threat), because of the size of the legions, and their expertise
      • Upper Germany:
        • Fonteius Capito - had been assassinated by Galba
        • Galba sends out Flaccus who "lacked personality and prestige" and so couldn't control the soldiers
      • Lower Germany:
        • Verginius - been replaced by Galba because the Germanic legions had tried to offer him the throne
        • Sent out Aulus Vitellius who had no qualifications other than the fact that his father had held three consulships
    • Egypt
      • was "indifferent to law and ignorant to civil government" - so was left under the control of the imperial house, governed by an equestrian named Tiberius Alexander
      • Egypt's importance lies in its grain supply, and its difficulty to access
    • Judaea
      • Under the control of Vespasian. The Jews had revolted and Vespasian had been sent by Nero to quash it. Vespasian had sent Titus back to Rome to swear fealty to Galba
    • Mauritania, Raetia, Noricum, Thrace (north Africa and part of the Balkans)
      • "took their cue from the various armies near them, and were driven willy-nilly into support or hostility by the contact of more powerful influences"
    • Gallic Provinces
      • Communities closest to military districts in Germany were treated harshly and had territory taken from them, whilst others were granted prospects of tax relief
    • Syria
      • The governor was Licinius Mucianus - removed to remote part of Asia because he had angered Claudius "a compound of self-indulgence and energy, courtesy and arrogance, good and evil...remarkable when he put his mind to something" - Syria had 4 legions and so could pose a threat
      • Licinius Mucianus was "more congenial to make an emperor than be one"
Danger of his position
  • Galba's march to Rome exemplifies the tenuous position he was in
  • Tacitus' narrative of the journey is dominated by executions, such as Clodius Macer and Fonteius Capito, on suspicion they were plotting against him
  • He also disposed of Nymphidius Sabinus, Prefect of the Praetorians, who had attempted to seize the Principate himself, only to be stopped by his troops
  • The influence he was under by Titus Vinius and Cornelius Laco, as well as his freedman Icelus, shows how feeble Galba was as an emperor
  • By the time Galba therefore reached Rome in late September of 68 AD, much of the popularity he enjoyed had begun to erode
Galba's Propaganda
Galba did however try to utilise propaganda to secure his position, a number of coins were commissioned in late 68 AD that attempt to persuade the Romans of the benefits of his rule
Study the coinage Galba commissioned in 68/69 AD:
  1. Looking at these examples, what messages was Galba trying to convey to the Roman people about his rule?
    1. First coin
      • Obverse - "IMP GALBA" - Galba, Emperor, crowned with a laurel wreath
        • Laurel wreath is a sign of victory
      • Reverse - Roma, in military dress, advancing with victory on globe "ROMA RENASCENS" - Roma rises again
        • "Roma rises" makes the people feel included and appeals to conservatism (basically MAGA but MRGA)
      • Sends the message that Rome has been ruled poorly but Galba has come to save the day
    2. Second coin
      • Obverse - Galba, laureate head "Servius Galba, Emperor"
      • Reverse - Concordia (goddess of harmony), standing holding olive branch and cornucopia - "CONCORDIA PROVINCIALIS" - "Harmony of the provinces"
        • Olive branch = peace
        • Cornucopia = plenty
    3. Third coin
      • Obverse "IMP GALBA" - Galba, emperor, crowned with a laurel wreath, globe underneath
      • Reverse - Roma standing and holding spear, foot at globe "ROMA VICTRIX" - Roma victorious
      • Rome back on top - making a comeback
  2. Why might he have chosen these particular messages?
    • To big himself up and gain favour from the people as he was to be the hero to save them and make Rome great again
  3. Why do you think he utilised coinage to spread his propaganda?
    • Coins spread all over the world and were used by everyone
Galba's Declining Popularity
However, propaganda was not enough to secure his position, and quickly his relations with different groups in Rome eroded...
Tacitus, Histories,
  • 1.5 - Galba's relationship with the Praetorians
  • 1.6-7 - influences on Galba and threats to his power
Suetonius, Galba,
  • 11 - Galba's reaction to Nero's death
  • 12-14 - examples of Galba's character and influences on him
  • 15-16 - His policies as emperor and why they were unpopular
  • 22 - Further influences on Galba
  1. Why did Galba's popularity decline, both at Rome and in the provinces?
    • Tacitus - Galba showed a violent nature - murdered any potential threats without a right to trial - often killed the conspirator's family too - Cruel/Tyrannical
    • Suetonius - Annulled all rewards given out by Nero - only allowing them to retain 1/10th of the original sum and forced people to pay back the rest BUT he allowed everything for his friends and supporters "taxes here, exemptions there, an innocent party accused here, a culprit excused there - Inconsistent/Nepotistic
    • Suetonius - Halotus and Tigellinus, two of Nero's most hated agents, were not brought to justice, and Tigellinus was defended by an imperial edict - Tone-deaf/Biased
    • Suetonius - Restricted appointments of all Senators and Equestrians to two year periods, and would only choose those he thought would refuse the position
    • Suetonius - He was greedy and miserly - when the people of Tarraco offered him a golden crown from the ancient temple of Jupiter (described as weighing 15lbs), he had it melted down and as it was 3 ounces light, made them pay the difference - Greedy and Miserly
    • Suetonius - The provincials who were the slowest to support him were taxed the heaviest - Petty
  2. Why did Galba lose the support of the Praetorians?
    • Tacitus and Suetonius - he broke his promise to pay the Praetorians for abandoning Nero "I levy my troops, I do not buy them" (Suet) - Manipulative
    • Tacitus - He killed the Praetorian Prefect Nymphidius Sabinus, and then dismissed many for being accomplices
    • He also dismissed the German bodyguards, who had always remained loyal - Paranoid
  3. What characteristics can we identify in Galba as emperor?
    • Cruel
    • Tyrannical
    • Inconsistent
    • Nepotistic
    • Tone-deaf
    • Biased
    • Greedy
    • Miserly
    • Petty
    • Manipulative
    • Paranoid
  4. What influence did others have on Galba? What problems did this cause?
  5. What threats did Galba face to his power?
The Rise of Otho
  • The significance of Galba's refusal to pay Donatives to the troops emphasises how out of touch Galba was with recent military practices, but it also highlights how loyalty with the army was secured now in Rome, to the highest bidder
However Galba's greatest failure was to not believe that others would try to attempt what he had done: seize the imperial throne
In particular, he underestimated the ambitions of his ally, Marcus Salvius Otho
  • Tacitus, 1.13, Suetonius, Otho, 5
    • According to the sources what were Otho's ambitions?
      • Suetonius - Otho was seeking revenge for Nero - he used to be one of his close friends
      • Tacitus + Suetonius - Otho hoped through his loyalty to Galba to be rewarded with adoption, and so was thoroughly disappointed when Galba adopted Piso
      • Suetonius - Otho was heavily in debt and hoped becoming emperor would save him
      • Tacitus - Otho earned the support of the Praetorian Cohorts and Nero's courtiers - whom he used to be friends with
  • Tacitus 1.14, 1.18-22, Suetonius, Galba, 17
    • Who did Galba pick as his successor? How did the soldiers react to this appointment and why?
      • Suetonius - Galba thought his unpopularity was due to his age and childlessness, so he picked a young heir in Piso
      • Tacitus + Suetonius - The soldiers' reaction was lukewarm because he had not promised any donation
      • Tacitus - The Senate congratulated Piso on his adoption/appointment, either because of their associations with Laco, who had proposed Piso, or because of fear of reprisal once Piso became emperor
  • Tacitus 1.27-28, 1.41-43, Suetonius, Otho, 6, Suetonius, Galba, 20
    • Outline how Otho overthrew Galba, what groups were most important in this coup?
      • Suetonius - Otho originally planned to capture Galba at dinner shortly after Piso's adoption, but the same cohorts that were on guard for the deaths of Caligula and Nero were on standby that day, and did not want to further sully their reputation
      • Tacitus + Suetonius - Otho planned the coup for 15th January, when Galba and Piso were sacrificing in the Temple of Apollo. Meanwhile Otho posted his conspirators in the forum near the Temple of Saturn
      • Tacitus - When Otho saww the small number of soldier (23) he was disappointed that more hadn't come
      • Tacitus + Suetonius - Otho excused himself from Galba with a watchword "the architects are here" and was taken to the Praetorian barracks
      • There are two accounts of Galba's demise:
        • Tacitus - He groveled and promised the bounties "I am yours, you are mine"
        • Suetonius - "most accounts agree" - he bared his neck and told the soldiers to do the deed
      • Tacitus - Piso escapes the Forum and flees to a nearby temple, but is pursued by two centurions. They drag him outside and kill him.
      • Suetonius - A soldier cut of Galba's head and the praetorians paraded around with it on a pike
  • Suetonius, Otho, 8
    • What relationship did Otho have with the Praetorian Guard?
      • Suetonius - "the Praetorians gave such unequivocal proof of their faithfulness to Otho that it almost involved the massacre of the Senate"
        • Praetorians saw some sailors moving weapons at the docks and assumed the Senate was leading a coup
        • They burst into the palace, murdered the Tribunes who tried to stop them and found Otho quietly having dinner (they really wanted that bounty)
        • Sunk cost fallacy
    • What challenges did he immediately face upon becoming emperor?
      • Suetonius - Immediate challenge was Germany - the soldiers had taken an oath of allegiance to Vitellius
      • Otho sent an official deputation to Germany from the Senate ordering the Germanic legions to stand down because an emperor had already been appointed
      • He sent a private letter to Vitellius, promising him a share of the empire
      • BUT - Vitellius' armies were already on their way to Italy - "war was inevitable"
Otho's Accession
Galba's end came on the 15th January, 69 AD, only five days after Piso's adoption
  • Whilst Galba offered sacrifices in front of the Temple of Palatine Apollo, Otho made excuses to leave and headed to the Praetorian camp to seek proclamation as emperor
  • Their response was... lukewarm
    • "Their mood may be summed up thus; a shocking crime was committed on the unscrupulous initiative of a few individuals, with the blessing of more, and amid the passive acquiescence of all" - Tacitus, Histories, 28
  • This could be used to summarise the entire civil war; the people themselves were not leaders of revolts, and essentially acted only when the status quo was no longer beneficial
  • This may help to explain the rise of the military's importance in the making and breaking of emperors
    • "After this (the killing of Galba), the troops got their way with everything... theft or taking on jobs as servants were the means by which they paid for time off... finally, when the money had given out they returned to their units in an idle and unhealthy state, reduced from affluence to poverty and from vigour to sloth. This process was repeated interminably, and the same destitution and indiscipline ruined man after man, driving them herd-like down the slope that leads to mutiny and civil war" - Tacitus, Histories, 1.46

Tuesday, 8 September 2020

Year 2 Introduction

What's New in A-Level?

Greek
- Greek Period Study
- Relations between Greek states and between Greek and non-Greek states, 492-404 BC
- Greek Depth Study
- The Politics and Society of Sparta, 478-404 BC

Rome
- Roman Period Study
- The Julio-Claudian Emperors, 31 BC - AD 68
- Roman Depth Study
- The Flavians, AD 68-96

The Politics and Society of Sparta
  • Exploring Spartan society and the developments in the 5th century BC including:
    • Education and its role in Spartan society
    • The Social Structure of Sparta
    • The Political Structure of Sparta
    • Spartan Military culture and its importance in society
    • Other states' views of Sparta and Sparta's role in the Greek world

Friday, 21 August 2020

The "Restoration" of the Republic: Augustus' Revival of Traditional Practices and Values

Moral Decline? Horace Ode 3.6
"Ancestral crimes, though innocent, you'll pay
The gods for, Roman, till you restore
Their temples, their crumbling shrines,
And images with black smoke besmirched.
Because you hold yourself less than the gods, you rule
Hence your beginning; to this ascribe your end.
Neglected, the gods have visited many
Woes upon grief-stricken Italy.
Fertile in sin our times stained first
The marriage-bed, the family, the home.
Our parents, more degenerate than their sires,
In us have fathered still more rotten stock - 
And yet more prone to vice will be our heirs"

In late republican Rome, there was a perceived threat to Roman society, born from a lack of piety and moral degeneracy
Roman Moral Decline
The last years of the Roman Republic were plagued by: civil wars and violence, new cults from the East, and growing scepticism among the upper classes
Neglect of Religion - "Though guiltless, Romans, you will pay for the sins of your ancestors, until you rebuild the temples and the crumbling shrines of the gods"
Decline in Morality
"Generations fertile in guilt have befouled marriage and the family and the home. Disaster flowing from this spring flooded the country and its people"

Importance to Augustus
  • The message of Horace and other contemporary writers is evident: Rome had become decadent and corrupt, and society needed to change
  • The stakes were high: the very moral fabric of Rome was under a perceived attack, and the downfall of Roman civilisation would be the consequence
  • Augustus therefore presented himself as a "saviour" of Roman moral virtue, who would restore not only the political institutions of the ancient Republic, but also the day-to-day values of the Romans
Augustus' Answer
"By new laws carried with me as sponsor, I revived many ancestral models which were falling into disuse in our age, and myself handed on many model practices for posterity to imitate" - Res Gestae 8.5

New Laws
Augustus himself or others on his behalf, submitted to the assembly a large number of new laws: Passed in 18 BC
  1. Lex lulia de Adulteriis = forbidding the violation of marriage by making adultery illegal
  2. Lex lulia de Maritandis Ordinibus = putting the elite orders under an obligation to marry in an attempt to counter a declining birth-rate among Rome's elite
  3. Lex Papia Poppaea = Modified the previous law in AD 9 due to public backlash
Changes in Policy
Despite changes at the general administration level being carried out with restraint, Augustus' policies had a fundamental impact on people's lives. Never before had laws and state programs affected individuals and communities in so many different forms or so extensively

Ovid's View Fasti 2.119-44
Pater Patriae, your Country's Holy Father, such is the name and title
Conferred upon you by People, Senate, and my own Equestrians.
Events preceded us. Late though it was, your title merely matched
The achievement; for long since have you been Father of the World.
Yours is the title here on earth which high in heaven is that of Jupiter;
Father you are of men on earth, as of gods in heaven is that of Jupiter.
Romulus, yield pride of place: mighty the walls Augustus' guardianship
Has given to Rome, while yours were such that Remus lightly leaped across.
Tatius and tiny Sabine Cures felt your power; Caenina too. But Roman
From furthest east to utmost west have Caesar's conquests made
All that the sun beholds. You, Romulus, held some tiny stretch
Of conquered land. Caesar controls all that there is beneath the gaze
Of lofty Jupiter. You raped, where Caesar commanded sacrosanctity
For wives; your grove played host to wickedness, Caesar repulsed it.
Violence you ever loved; while Caesar cherishes the rule of law.

Religion In Ancient Rome
Characteristics
  • Roman religion was cold, formal, and lacked emotional involvement
  • It did give the Romans a tolerance towards the beliefs and practices of other people - including those whom they conquered
Aspects of Worship:
  • Worship involved sacrifice and prayer and the two were always combined
  • Only when the proper procedures on both state and household level were observed would the gods answer their prayers
  • If there was any mistake - however minute - in the performance of the ritual, the whole process would have to be restarted
Augustus' Religious Policy
  • Priesthoods: Augustus was a member of every priestly college
  • Pontifex Maximus: The chief pontiff gave Augustus religious control over all major religious ceremonies in Rome
  • Religious Tradition: Augustus restored and revived many outdated practices that had fallen into disuse
  • Propaganda: Statues, architecture, poetry and coins all emphasised a revival of religious tradition and a restoration of "piety" to the Roman state
Ludi Saeculares
Ludi = Games
Saeculares = Generation
  • Celebrations held in ancient Rome to mark the commencement of a new saeculum, or generation, circa once every 100 years
  • The festival lasted three days and three nights, during which sacrifices were made to various deities. Originally the gods of the underworld were worshipped. However, later festivals included gods such as Diana and Apollo
  • The first attested Roman celebration of the games took place in 249 BC, the second was in 146 BC, and the third, under Augustus, in 17 BC
  • The performance of these games was believed to ensure the continuity of Roman power. Although an old ritual, Augustus transformed the celebration so that it fit in with his new imperial ideology
  • The games were used as a way of officially marking the beginning of a "Golden Age" in Rome
Horace's Carmen Saeculare
If Rome is your doing, and if from far Ilium
Cme that band of people who reached the Tuscan shore,
Those commanded to change their home and their city,
On a lucky course,

Those for whom pious Aeneas, the survivor,
Who passed without injury through the flames of Troy,
Prepared a path to freedom, destined to grant him
Much more than he'd lost:

Then, you divinities, show our receptive youth
Virtue, grant peace and quiet to the old, and give
Children and wealth to the people of Romulus,
And every glory.

Whatever a noble descendant of Venus
And Anchises, asks, with a white steer's sacrifice,
Let him obtain: a winner in war, merciful
To our fallen foe.

Now the Parthians fear our forces, powerful
On land, and on sea: they fear the Alban axes,
Now the once proud Indians, now the Scythians
Beg for an answer.

Now Faith and Peace, Honour, and ancient Modesty,
Dare to return once more, with neglected Virtue,
And blessed Plenty dares to appear again, now,
With her flowing horn

Prophecy of Augustus, The Aeneid 6.792-3
And see this race, your Romans. Here is Caesar and all
lulus' offspring, destined to pass beneath the great vault of heaven.
This is the man, this is he whom so often you hear promised to you,
Augustus Caesar, son of a god, who shall bring back again
The age of gold to Latium, the very land where once
Old Saturn ruled, and shall spread our empire's bounds
Beyond the Garamantes and Indians, whose countries lie
Beyond the stars and the courses of time, and beyond
The highway of the sun, where Atlas, pillar of heaven, wheels
The firmament on his shoulders, studded with blazing stars.

Prophesises the Age of Augustus and links to the Saturnian "Golden age" through Augustus' reign

Suetonius, Augustus, 31
Provides further details of Augustus' religious policy:
  • Assumed title of Pontifex Maximus only after Lepidus had died in 2 BC
  • Burned more than two thousand prophetic verses of Greek and Latin
  • Modified Sybiline Books before sparing these from being torched
  • Reorganised the calendar, changing the name of the sixth month from Sextilis to August
  • Increased the number and importance of priests, and their allowances and privileges
  • Specifically favoured Vestal Virgins, swearing if any of his grand-daughters were eligible he would have enlisted them to the order when there was a shortage of willing women
  • Revived ancient rites and festivals: Secular Games, Lupercalia, Lares Compitales

Thursday, 6 August 2020

The Imperial Cult

The Notion of Emperor Worship
  • The cult of the emperor's 'genius' was first introduced during the time of Augustus
  • The genius was regarded as the divine spirit of an individual - to worship the genius of the Princeps was a form of homage
  • This is different from the 'numen', the Roman term for a god
  • It was rapidly established throughout the empire and its provinces, with marked local variations in its reception and expression
Emperors and Religion
  • The princeps was expected to balance the interests of the Roman military, senate and people and maintain peace, security and prosperity throughout an ethnically diverse empire
  • The imperial cult became an important unifying factor in the vastly under governed Roman empire
  • It was mutually beneficial for both Rome and its subjects. Most importantly, it was a focal point for loyalty to Rome and the emperor
  • For the provincial elites it also provided new opportunities for social advancement. Yet, despite its political significance, the imperial cult should not be simply dismissed as a political tool
Roman religion and Emperor Worship
What permitted the naturalisation of emperor worship into Roman religious life?
  • Ancestor worship was already an established element of Roman religion
  • Ancient religions placed importance on external action over internal beliefs - there was no need to reconcile faith because of this
  • Worship of rulers was an already well established phenomenon in other ancient societies, particularly in the east
  • The emperors already took an extremely central role in the religious life of the city - such as the adoption of pontifex maximus as an official imperial title
The Cult and the Emperor
Each emperor took a different approach to the cult. Some, such as Caligula, openly embraced it, whilst others such as Tiberius seem to reject the worship altogether. However many steps were taken over the period to establish the Imperial Cult both at home and abroad:
  •  Julius Caesar was deified as a god following his assassination, as at his funeral a comet was seen passing overhead. Augustus continued to emphasise this close association and adopted the title "divi filius" - "son of a god"
  • The emperor's name was also often associated with the worship of Fortuna and Roma
  • Provincial elites could set up temples and altars to honour the emperor
  • Statues and coins would emphasise divine links
Establishing the Cult: Augustus
No formal arrangements for ruler-worship existed in Rome before Augustus. As usual he was pragmatic and approached the situation differently depending on where he was aiming to cultivate worship for himself:
The Provinces
  • Ruler worship was already firmly established in Eastern cultures such as Egypt and Greece (e.g worship of the Pharaohs)
  • Views of the emperors came solely through official representation, such as statues, that made the emperors seem semi-divine already (i.e Augustus never ages in his statues or coins)
  • Several steps were also taken by Augustus to officialise the cult both at Rome and abroad:
    • The creation of local religious cults combined with temples across the empire focused on the worship of the emperor and the imperial family
    • However these were carefully managed and integrated into local religious customs rather than being forced onto peoples
"He treated with great respect such foreign rites as were ancient and well established, but held the rest in contempt. For example, having been initiated in Athens and afterwards sitting in judgment of a case at Rome involving the privileges of the priests of Attic Ceres, in which certain matters of secrecy of bystanders and heard the disputants in private. But on the other hand he not only omitted to make a slight detour to visit Apis, when he was travelling through Egypt, but highly commended his grandson Gaius for not offering prayers at Jerusalem as he passed by Judaea" - Suetonius
  • [Tacitus 4.37] - Reveals Augustus approved of a temple to himselg and Roma that was requested by the people of Pergamum
  • [Strabo, 4.3.2] - temple to Augustus at Lugdunum (Lyons)
    • "The temple dedicated to Caesar Augustus by the union of all the Celtic people is situated in front of this city at the confluence of the two rivers. In it there is a remarkable altar inscribed with the names of their tribes, sixty in number, together with a representative image for each tribe, plus another large altar"
  • [Lactor 17] - Inscription from an altar to the numen of Augustus in Narbonne, detailing their dedication to worship him such as annual sacrifices
In Rome Augustus was far more tact:
  • [Ovid Fasti 5.140-158] - Augustus incorporated his genius alongside the Lares Compitales, crossroad protection gods
    • "Rome had a thousand twin Lares now, and a leader's Genius... every district now pays honour to its three divinities"
  • [Lactor 17] - inscriptional evidence for Lares introduction
    • "Dedicated to the Augustan Lares"
  • [Tacitus 1.10.6]
    • "There were no honours left for the gods, now that Augustus chose to be worshipped with temples and godlike images by flamines and priests"
  • [Horace + Ovid] - refer to Augustus as a living god or Jupiter on earth in their poetry
Case Study: Tiberius
Tiberius' reluctance to rule as an emperor is reflected in his overall attitude and approach towards the imperial cult, in which he sought to distance himself from any notions of worship for him...
  • "Of many high honours he accepted only a few of the more modest. He forbade the voting of temples, flamens, and priests in his honour, and even the setting up of statues and busts without his permission; and this he gave only with the understanding that they were not to be placed among the likenesses of the gods, but among the adornments of the temples. He also declined the forename Imperator, the surname of Father of his Country, and the placing of the civic crown at his door; and he did not even use the title of Augustus in any letters except those to kings and potentates, although it was his by inheritance" - Suetonius
  • However, he was happy to encourage the worship of the now deified Augustus, and even took some steps to enhance it:
    • Tiberius created a specialised priesthood known as the Sodales Augustales which were dedicated to the cult of the deified Augustus
    • Coins also emphasise Augustus as "Divus" and Tiberius as "son of the Divine Augustus"
    • Tiberius would have wanted to emphasise the link to Augustus so the people (and senate) would support him as they supported Augustus
  • There is also evidence that, although Tiberius did not wish to be worshipped, others still tried to:
    • [L4 Lactor 19] Inscription from Gytheion in Laconia
      • Describes how Tiberius and the Imperial Family will be honoured, including statues, games and festivities, and sacrifices
    • [Tacitus] tells us of Tiberius' response:
      • Approved the worship for his family, but rejected for himself and even apologised to the senate "I am content with mortal honours"
    • [L6 Lactor 19] Inscription from AD 27, Rome
      • "to the genius of Tiberius Caesar Augustus, son of the Divine Augustus, Gaius Fulvius Chryses... gave this as a gift"
      • shows individual worship and honours could still exist, even though the emperor personally disproved of them
Activity: Gaius Caligula
Bullet point different steps taken by Gaius to establish worship for himself
  • Cassius Dio - Divine pretensions and megalomania:
    • Caligula had been demanding to be considered more than a mere human being, and when people started calling him a demi-god and even a god "he went completely out of his mind"
    • Kept declaring that he was having sex with Luna, the moon goddess, and being crowned by victory
    • Kept pretending he was Jupiter and used this as a pretext to sleep with many women, including his own sisters
    • Other times claimed to be Neptune, because he had bridged such a large stretch of water
    • Also imitated Hercules, Bacchus, Apollo and others, as well as Juno, Diana and Venus
    • He would dress up as different gods all the time, even changing half way through the day
    • "It was these costumes that he used to assume, then, whenever he was pretending to be some god; and in addition supplications, prayers and sacrifices would be offered to him as was thought fit"
    • He cut the temple of Castor and Pollux in two, creating an entrance to the palace right through the middle of the temple so he could "have the Dioscuri as his gate-keepers"
    • Designated himself Jupiter Latiaris and appointed his wife Caesonia, Claudius and other very rich individuals as his priests. He received 2.5 million denarii from each of them. He then went even further and swore himself in as a priest of himself, and appointed his horse a fellow priest - all kinds of expensive birds were sacrificed to him daily
    • Ordered that a sacred precinct be consecrated to him in Miletus because he wanted to take over the "large and exceedingly beautiful" temple that the Milesians were building in honour of Apollo
    • Already constructed a sort of lodge on the Capitoline to share quarters with Jupiter. However, he did not approve of being the junior partner in this union of households and blamed Jupiter for having occupied the Capitoline before him. So he pressed on with the erection of another temple on the Palatine, and wanted to transfer it to the statue of Zeus that he'd had remodelled to look like him, but the ship built to carry the statue was wrecked by lightning
  • Suetonius - attempts to establish the Imperial Cult in Rome
    • Adopted a variety of titles, including Caesar Optimus Maximus (Jupiter was often called Jupiter Optimus Maximus)
    • Once, at the dinner table, some foreign kings, who had come to pay homage, were arguing about who was the most nobly descended. Caligula burst out "Nay let there be one master, and one king" and almost assumed a royal diadem there and then. However, once his courtiers reminded him that he already outranked any king or local ruler, he insisted on being treated as a god - arranging for the most revered or artistically famous statues of the gods to be brought from Greece and have their heads replaced by his own
    • At his temple he had a life-sized golden statue of himself that was dressed each day in the same clothes he happened to be wearing on that day
  • Josephus - Gaius usurping divine honours as another example of his madness
    • Brazenly addressed Jupiter as his brother
    • Instead of simply taking a trireme from Campanian to Misenum, he built a bridge nearly four miles long and drove across it in his chariot "since he was lord of the ocean, he felt entitled to demand the same sort of service from the sea as he did from the land"

Tuesday, 4 August 2020

Relations with Senate, Equestrians and the People: Panem et Circenses: Bread and Circuses

Roman Social Structure
Broadly based on a rigid class system
Patricians:
  • The Roman elite
  • Wealthiest and most influential in Roman society - the aristocracy
  • Members could trace their lineage back to the original nobility of the Roman kingdom
  • Men from this class would be enrolled into the Senate
Equestrians:
  • Wealthy individuals in Rome who were not Patricians
  • Far greater in number than the Patricians
  • Original name derives from the fact that in the early Republic the Equestrians were the cavalry in the Roman army, since they were wealthy enough to own a horse
Plebeians
  • Freeborn Roman citizens, with full political and legal rights
  • Differed greatly in wealth and status, with some very rich all the way down to the urban poor who depended on state handouts of food and provisions for their survival
Political Representation
The Plebs
Domestic power was vested in the Roman people through:
  • the Centuriate Assembly (Comitia Centuriata)
  • the Tribal Assembly (Comitia Tributa)
  • the Plebeian Council (Concilium Plebis)
The two Assemblies passed new laws, as did the Council, which also elected Rome's magistrates

The Senate
The Senate did not have law-making power. It only made recommendations to the Plebeian Council
Nevertheless, the Senate held considerable clout (auctoritas) in Roman politics:
  • It was the official body that sent and received ambassadors, and it appointed officials to manage public lands, including the provincial governors
  • It conducted wars and it also appropriated public funds
  • It was the Senate that authorised the city's chief magistrates, the consuls, to nominate a dictator in a state of emergency
The Senate
  • In theory the senate was purely and advisory body
  • In practice it became a real governing body in Rome
Power Increase:
This came about during the wars with Carthage and its supremacy in the state was consolidated during the second century. Senatorial power was based not on law but purely on custom, precedent and prestige of its members

Late Republican Senate
  • In the Late Republic, an archconservative faction emerged, who called themselves the boni (The Good Men) or Optimates
  • The Late Republic was characterised by the social tensions between the broad factions of the Optimates and the newly wealthy Populares. This became increasingly expressed by domestic fury, violence and fierce civil strife
  • Examples of Optimates include Lucius Cornelius Sulla and Pompey the Great, while Gaius Marius, Lucius Cornelius Cinna and Gaius Julius Caesar were Populares
  • The labels Populares and Optimates are not, however, as concrete as sometimes assumed, and politicians could often change factions
Populares = favouring the people
  • Populares sought popular support against the dominant oligarchy, either in the interests of the people themselves or in furtherance of their own personal ambitions
Optimates = the dominant group
  • Pro-aristocratic faction of the later Roman Republic. They wished to limit the power of the popular assembies and the Tribunes of the Plebs, and to extend the power of the Senate
The Senate (again)
  • In our period, senators were the wealthy, educated male elite of the empire
  • In AD 14, most senators were drawn from either long-established Roman families or the Italian nobility
  • They had to own property in excess of 1,000,000 sesterces, and membership of the senate was hereditary
Entry Methods
  • This system was not effective at maintaining numbers in the senate, though, as the senatorial families did not reproduce reliably enough to fill all gaps left by deaths or retirement
  • So two other means were created to allow people to enter the order:
    1. Someone who did not belong to the senatorial order were given the right to wear latus clavus (thick purple stipe denoting senatorial status) by the emperor, which then gave them the right to stand for magistracies and enter the senate
    2. Adlection: the practice of the emperor nominating someone who has won his favour to automatic membership of the senate, without them needing to hold a magistracy first
  • These methods might be used to bring members of the equestrian order into the senate, and, increasingly, to bring wealthy provincials into the senate
Role and Regulations
  • In Rome, the Senate met once a fortnight, held debates and proposed legislation. Under the emperors, though, the issues they dealt with tended to be those which were unlikely to be controversial e.g. the construction of roads, aqueducts, religious matters.
  • More important issues, such as taxation, foreign relations, military policy, etc. were now considered chiefly by the imperial court instead - i.e the emperor, his household and a select group of Senators
  • 'Good' emperors made a point of showing interest in the debate and opinions of Senators, 'bad' emperors did not
  • The Senate also acted as a criminal court for cases of corruption and adultery committed by people within their own social class and as governors of provinces
What was central to the relationship?
  • The emperor's relationship with the Senate centred on two main areas:
    1. Respect for their privileges and powers
    2. The use of the Senate in administration - giving them roles and responsibilities to fulfil
 

Post

Responsibilities

Pre-requisites

Age qualification

Number of officer-holders p.a.

Vigintivir

Junior magistrates responsible for minting coins, executing criminals, judging legal cases and overseeing care of streets

Must be sons of senators

18

20

Military tribune

One of six assistants to the commander of a legion

Optional follow-up to vigintivirate

Usually early 20s

6 per legion (of which there were normally 28).

Quaestor

Treasurer – often served in provinces

Follow-up to vigintivirate. Candidate enters senate proper at this point

24

20

Aedile

In charge of city maintenance, markets and games in 

Optional follow-up to quaestorship

After quaestorship

6

Tribune of the plebs

In the Republic, a defender of the ordinary people; by now largely ceremonial post whose powers had passed to the emperor

Optional follow-up to quaestorship

After quaestorship

10

Praetor

Mainly responsible for the administration of justice

Must have completed quaestorship; ideally also aedileship / tribunate

29

12 under Tiberius; 17 or 18 by time of Trajan

Consul

Chief magistrates of in the Republic; now second only to the emperor

Must have completed praetorship

42

2 at any one time, but 4 per annum (i.e. two pairs) under Tiberius, rising to 8 or 10 by the end of the first century AD.

Roughly 350 positions in total
The Equestrian Order
  • The Equestrian Order (ordo equester) is very much a part of the ruling elite of the empire, but is distinct from and slightly less prestigious than the senatorial order
  • It has its roots in the Republic, when equestrians were essentially wealthy citizens who were not politically active. They were not members of the senate, and tended to involve themselves in trade and tax collection instead
  • They were also closely involved in the army - initially they had literally been 'knights' in the sense of cavalry, but by the late Republic were serving instead as army officers. However, from the Augustun period onwards, their role in both military and civilian administration increased
Differentiating Equestrians/Senators: Eligibility
  • Equestrians were distinguished from the senatorial order partly by wealth - the property qualification to be an equestrian was 400,000 sestertii, compared to 1 million for a senator
  • Even if they acquired the necessary wealth, they could not enter the senatorial order without special dispensation from the emperor, as senatorial status was hereditary
  • Entry into the equestrian order was much more open. All that was needed was the 400,000 sestertii and 'good morals' (adherence to the Roman state and its values
  • This meant that members of local civic elites in Italy and the provinces could readily achieve equestrian status
  • Membership carried with it visible privileges (as with the senatorial order) - e.g the angustus clavus (narrow purple stripe on the tunic and toga) and seats in the front rows in the theatre and amphitheatre
Role in the Period
  • In the period covered by this module, all emperors came from the senatorial order - so another important distinction between senators and equestrians is that senators could potentially set themselves up as rivals to the reigning emperors, but equestrians could not
  • As for senators, there was a distinct career ladder for equestrians to climb - generally they tended to hold procuratorships first and then move on to prefectures, but individuals varied, with plenty clearly choosing to specialise in military posts only
  • Typical careers are preserved by honorific and funerary inscriptions - examples can be seen at LACTOR 8, nos. 21-23 (Tiberian period), 37 (Nero's Praetorian Prefect, Burrus) 70 (Flavian period) and 82-83 (Trajanic period)
Use of Equestrians
Reasons for the increasing use of equestrians during the imperial period are debated:
  • Some argue that emperors preferred to entrust sensitive positions (e.g the command of the Praetorian Guard or the governorship of Egypt, which supplied much of Rome's grain), to them because senators appointed to these positions might potentially use them as leverage in order to mount a challenge to the emperor's power
  • But this is not entirely consistent - senators also commanded the legions and governed most of the provinces, and could (and did) usurp power on the basis of the military control which this gave them
  • The alternative argument is that equestrians were used because the emperors simply needed:
    • the political support of the order; and
    • their military and financial experience to help them in the vast task of governing the empire
Senators: Activity
  1. Which emperors maintained good relations with these groups? Which did not? Why?
    1. Augustus - relatively good relationship:
      • Augustus' rise to power effectively rendered the senate powerless in political policy making. The constitutional settlements in 27 and 23 BC established the principate and greatly reduced the power of the senate. This meant that he needed to placate the senate to a degree. He did this by giving money to individual senators to secure their loyalty and create dependency on the princeps
      • Macrobius "Augustus had actually paid off the debts of a senator friend of his unasked, to the tune of about four million sesterces. In return, by way of thanks for his generosity he got the following note "nothing for me then?"" - ungrateful. Augustus paid off his debt but didn't give him any money to spend himself.
      • Augustus also worked hard to maintain the Republican framework for senators, making it appear on the surface that nothing had changed, in order to keep a good relationship with the senate
      • Suetonius - "To enable more men to take part in the administration of the state, he (Augustus) devised new offices"
        • Included officials for city management and preservation, grain distribution, and new censors. By increasing the number of roles he increased competition by expanding the cursus honorum, which gave senators something to work towards
      • Suetonius - Augustus purged the senate of troublemakers and made it more exclusive. During his reign he reduced the number of senators from 1,000 to 600. He also imposed extra restrictions, for example an inheritance tax of 5% in 6AD, which reinforced his dominance (auctoritas)
      • Augustus created a privy council, the Concilium Principis, which included 2 consuls and 15 senators. It changed every 6 months and allowed him to exert greater control over policy
      • He also increased the influence of the Equestrians with roles meant specifically for them, including the Superintendents of the Roman Police force/Fire Brigade, of the Province of Egypt and of the Praetorian Cohorts. According to Suetonius "at the elections for tribunes if there were not candidates enough of senatorial rank, he made appointments from among the Equestrians" - he did this because Equestrians could never dream of overthrowing him, and so there was no harm in giving them certain positions, whereas senators were of a high enough social rank to be a threat, and so their power had to be mitigated
      • However:
        • Giving money to certain senators could have caused a bad relationship with other senators as they could have thought that he was playing favourites. This could have created a foundation for a revolt or a coup. This did in fact happen, as Suetonius tells us that senators Varro Murena and Fannius Caepi tried to kill him. This shows that Augustus only really had good relations with specific senators
        • Suetonius - when Augustus went into the senate house, he would greet each senator by name. He would also go to their birthday parties and socialise with them, and there was even one incident where he went to visit a depressed senator who was starving himself. He made a real effort to treat the senators as equals. Augustus once said that he was inter pares (first among equals)
        • Tacitus - "Augustus forbade senators and equestrians of higher rank from entering Egypt except by permission, and he had specially reserved the country, from a fear that any one who held a province containing the key of the land and of the sea, with ever so small a force against the mightiest of army might distress Italy by famine" - this shows that there was little trust between the emperor and the senate/equestrians
        • Augustus also took all military provinces for himself
        • The most sensitive positions were given to himself or equestrians
        • Reduced the senate's power in Egypt
        • In 28 BC (just before the first constitutional settlement) Augustus and Agrippa selected senators to remove, but Suetonius tells us that this initially didn't work, as there were too many senators, so then they have the senate the power to remove others from their ranks
        • Suetonius - During this period, Augustus was so scared of the senate's reaction that he used to wear chain mail under his toga
        • Suetonius - Augustus deliberately made friends with the big boy senators and would have people coming close to him frisked
    2. Tiberius - poor relationship with the senate
      • Failed to maintain a good relationship with the senate and equestrians, despite efforts to work with the senate (during his accession and his claims of not wanting sole power). He actually tried to give the senate more power, but they thought he was bluffing and became even more sycophantic.
      • Tacitus - He gave the senate the power to create legislation without him, and the first thing the senate did was to decree that any time the emperor's name was to be written it must be written in gold (Tiberius was like ffs I tried)
      • A growing fear of the emperor stunted any good relations
      • Tacitus - "So corrupted indeed and debased was that age by sycophancy that not only the foremost citizens who were forced to save their grandeur by servility, but every ex-consul, most of the ex-praetors and a host of inferior senators would rise in eager rivalry to propose shameful and preposterous motions. Tradition says that Tiberius, as often as he left the Senate House used to exclaim in Greek "How ready these men are to be slaves!" Clearly, even he, with his dislike of public freedom, was disgusted at the abject abasement of his creatures"
      • The treason trials scared the senate so much that they resorted to sycophancy
    3. Caligula - poor relationship with the Senate
      • Following Caligula's reintroduction of the Maiestas Trials, Seneca writes that Caligula "tortured them in every conceivably painful way known to nature - by garrote, ankle pins, the rack, fire, and even having to look upon his face"
      • Caligula brought all of the documents from Tiberius' Maiestas Trials and burned then, but Suetonius and Cassius Dio tell us that it was fake (copies)
      • When Caligula reintroduced the treason trials, the senate actually thanked him for not killing them sooner (example of sycophancy)
      • Suetonius - Caligula once burst out laughing at a senate dinner, and when he was asked why, he said it was because he could have all of their throats slit right there and then if he wished, which is similar to when he exclaimed "If only all of Rome had but a single neck"
      • He once pulled all of the senators out of bed to dance for them, and had one senator killed when he hesitated to answer after being asked whether Caligula or a statue of a god was better
      • He thought so little of the senate that he once tried to make his horse consul (not madness, but taking the piss out of the senate)

    4. Claudius - struggled to maintain a good relationship with the senate
      • Suetonius - the use of his wives and freedmen to run the empire was in direct contradiction to the senate's wishes
      • He gave freedmen political positions and jobs usually reserved for senators
      • One inscription at Ostia shows that the superintendent of the port was an imperial freedman
      • He expanded equestrian rights, giving them the right to admission to imperial presence, however, Suetonius tells us that 300 equestrians were killed during Claudius' reign, implying a poor overall relationship
      • The fact that the senate tried to restore the republic shows how much they didn't want another emperor after Caligula. it is possible that his reign destroyed any possibility of Claudius having a good relationship with the senate
    5. Nero - poor relationship
      • Pisonian conspiracy - 41 senators were involved in the plot. They wanted rid of him because of his criminal record, his abolition of senate's rights, the way he lowered the tone of the imperial position, and the fact that he stripped the power to mint coins from the senate
      • Nero used the conspiracy to execute dozens of senators and equestrians, including Seneca (there was no evidence, Nero just wanted rid of him)
      • Suetonius "Often he hinted broadly that it was not his intention to spare the remaining senators, but would one day wipe out the entire senatorial order"
      • It's clear that Nero sought to humiliate the senate - though this may be an emphasis from the largely senatorial sources
      • The way he treated the people and the senate ultimately brought about his downfall at the hands of the senate and senatorial members during the revolts of Galba and Vindex (both senators) - this shows how bad the relationship was
      • Contrast between the Quinquennium Neronis and his later reign. During the first few years of his reign things were generally positive (largely due to his advisors and mother). It only worsened once he had Agrippina killed
      • Equestrians - Evidence for similar humiliation prevalent in Suetonius, where Nero uses the Equestrians as an order to heap praise and fawn over the emperor during artistic pursuits. Suetonius tells us that Nero selected some Equestrians and more than 5,000 commoners to learn the Alexandrian style of applause, and ordered them to applaud him whenever he sang.
  2. How did the functions of the Senate/Equestrians change under the emperors?
    • Claudius allowed Gauls to enter the senate
    • Caligula gave the power of elections back to the people
    • Augustus restricted Egypt and added more to the cursus honorum
    • Pisonian conspiracy
    • Nero stripped the power to make coins from the senate
  3. What evidence is there for resistance to the emperors from the Senate? How widespread were these threats?
    • Caligula was literally assassinated
    • Nero was made a public enemy
    • Thrasea Paetus showed unusual open opposition to the emperor by walking out of the senate. Nero would late have him killed after the Pisonian Conspiracy, and killed many other potential opponents too
    • Nero's reign was marred with conspiracies, such as the revolts of Galba and Vindex and the Pisonian conspiracy
    • Claudius also faced assassination attempts. According to Suetonius - "he was attacked by individuals, by a conspiracy and finally by a civil war. A man of the commons was caught near his bed chamber in the middle of the nigh, dagger in hand; and two members of the equestrian order were found lying in wait for him in public places"
    • According to Suetonius, Gallus and Corvinus (two senators) also tried to kill him, aided by his own freedmen, and Scribonianus started a civil war
    • Suetonius - Augustus "faced opposition from senate and family" - he put a stop to several outbreaks, attempts at revolution and conspiracies, which were betrayed before they became formidable"
    • However, all conspiracies against Augustus were personal rather than relating to his reign 
The People and the Emperors
Key areas of importance:
  1. Communication
  2. Emperors paying attention
  3. Emperors gaining the support of the people
  • Under the emperors the wishes of the people no longer counted as much, as elections were held in the senate and real power was in a single person's hands - the emperor
  • HOWEVER
  • The emperor still needed public support which could be gained through generosity - baths and games, the building of an ever more splendid and glorious city, control of grain supply and a better run and ordered city. Another powerful development was the imperial cult
Popular Emperors
  • Augustus and Claudius were popular because of their generosity, catering to the people through entertainment and a 'man of the people' image. The most successful were Augustus and Claudius
  • Keeping order in the city, maintaining peace and avoiding civil war were also important considerations
  • Augustan re-organisation of the city administration and the removal of corruption was also significant, as was military success
The Games and Theatre
  • Under the empire, the popular assemblies declined in importance - formal political contiones became much less frequent - although the emperor would on occasion address the people
  • Suetonius reports that Nero, about to be overthrown, had it in mind to make a speech to the people and throw himself on their mercy, but thought better of this scheme and the text of this speech was discovered on his desk after his death
  • The games provided an occasion at which emperor and people could meet, the emperor displaying his generosity to his citizens and enjoying the people's pleasures
  • BUT
  • The people might also seize the opportunity to express their disapproval of his activities
Case in Point
  • Tiberius returning a statue which he had removed to his palace from the Baths of Agrippa, and popular complaints about the high price of corn
  • Caligula, however, was less tolerant of such opposition and was said to have wished that the Roman people 'had only one neck' (Suetonius). On one occasion, spectators at the games protesting at high levels of taxation were executed
Emperors and the Plebeians
  1. Which emperors maintained good relations with the plebs? Which did not? Why?
    1. Augustus:
      • Maintained good relations
      • His success can be seen in public inscriptions commemorating vows for his safety (as seen on coins)
      • Used two key methods to ensure the loyalty of the plebs: entertainment and largesse (handouts)
      • Created the model used by later emperors "bread and circuses"
      • "Augustus won over the soldiers with gifts, the populace with cheap corn, and all men with the delights of peace" - Tacitus
      • Res Gestae - The people demanded that Augustus be given dictatorship in times of crisis, such as food shortages. He refused this, but took the superintendence of the corn supply and "through (his) expenditure and care", fixed the issue in a matter of days.
      • The management of grain was vital - the corn dole was how a large proportion of the Roman people were fed - they needed it to survive
      • Augustus set up a formal management system to deal with the shortages in AD 6-7 as a long term solution
      • He also used congiara - handouts of money. According to the Res Gestae he paid 300 sesterces to each man, which helped them to provide for themselves and avoid poverty. He gave them 400 sesterces each from war booty in his fifth consulship [29 BC] and again in his tenth consulship [24 BC]. This would have maintained a good relationship with the plebs, as previously they would have simply been ignored by the patricians who kept their money and power to themselves. Augustus made the people feel as if he cared for them, especially since it was his own money that he used. He also made twelve distributions of corn "purchased at my own expense" and he claims that "These gifts of mine never reached fewer than 250,000 citizens"
      • He paid 150 million sesterces (over four different occasions) to the treasury and paid 170 million sesterces to the military treasury (which was created by him to pay rewards to soldiers who had served for 20 years or more)
        • These constant gifts made him seems generous and made him indispensable. His money was essential to the running of the city. As they relied on him, they couldn't afford to get rid of his (besides the people would have reacted badly as they all loved him). This, therefore, kept him in power
      • According to the Res Gestae, he gave gladiatorial shows in his own name three times and five times in the names of his sons or grandsons (roughly 10,000 fought in these shows) - he also held "a display of athletes" three times and held the Centennial Games on behalf of the quindecimviri college (with Marcus Agrippa in 17 BC)
      • Also staged a naval battle in which 30 vessels joined
      • He also made a lot of administrative changes (see administration of imperial Rome post) which helped the city.
    2. Tiberius:
      • Poor relationship with the plebs
      • He was cautious with money, which did not sit well with the people as they had become accustomed to the generosity of Augustus.
      • Suetonius - "He gave no public shows at all, and very seldom attended those given by others"
      • After he was forced to buy the freedom of an actor, Actius, he declared that he would help no others unless they proved to the Senate that there were "legitimate causes for their condition"
      • Suetonius - "He showed generosity to the public in but two instances"
        1. He offered to lend 100 million sesterces without interest for three years
        2. He made good the losses of owners of houses in the Caelian mount, which had burned down
      • According to Suetonius, the former "was forced upon him by the clamour of the people for help in a time of great financial stress"
      • Suetonius also accuses Tiberius of "rarely allowing veteran soldiers their discharge" and hoping to save money through their deaths
      • "He did not relieve the provinces either by any act of liberality, except Asia, when some cities were destroyed by an earthquake"
      • Velleius Paterculus - Does give the impressions that Tiberius was extremely generous, but this may be due to his own personal favourability towards Tiberius - "how often and how generously he gave largesse to the people"
      • Generally there could be an unfair presentation by the sources - yes he was not a popular emperor, but who would be when compared to Augustus? Tiberius did what was needed but not what was expected
    3. Caligula
      • Poor relationship with the plebs
      • According to Pliny, Caligula began working on many new aqueducts, including the Anio Novus. This helped to improve the lives of ordinary Romans. See the Administration of Imperial Rome post for more detail
      • There is some evidence Caligula made steps to please the people, but Josephus follows the line that Caligula would brutalise any protesting citizens:
      • "Rome herself above all became only too aware of the sheer horror of his actions, since he afforded her no special treatment compared with other cities"
      • "He plundered and laid waste her citizens, but in particular the Senate, and those of its members who were patricians or highly respected for their distinguished ancestry" - which shows that his relationship with the plebs might not have been that bad as he focused the majority of his brutality on high society (and all writers were from the high orders of society)
      • Caligula forced parents to watch their children be executed (Suetonius)
      • Ordered a bridge to be built between his palace and the temple of Jupiter, claiming that he was a god and should be able to talk to this fellow deity
      • When meat became too expensive to feed to wild animals, he fed them criminals instead
      • Suetonius portrays Caligula in similar manner. After telling us about Caligula's treatment of Senators, he comments:
      • "He behaved just as violently and just as arrogantly towards the other orders of society"
      • Caligula once had a crowd, that was trying to get into the Circus to secure free seats, driven away with clubs. He also removed the canopy which provided shade at gladiatorial shows and blocked exits
      • "More than once he closed down the granaries and let people go hungry" - Suet
      • Cassius Dio - Caligula introduced severe tax measures and inscribed them on boards in very small letters and hung the, in a very high position so they would be "unaware of what was lawful and unlawful" - he did this because he had squandered 575 million denarii in less than a year
      • Caligula would complain that his reign had not been "marked by any great disaster which would have allowed him to win popularity through his relief efforts"
        • In other words, generosity to the people was just political expediency, not genuine concern for their welfare. This is not unique to Caligula. Suetonius tells us that Augustus realised this too, as he had been considering stopping the grain supply but didn't because he knew some politician would reintroduce it to gain popularity
      • All writers were upper-class, so there is a limited focus on Caligula's cruelty towards the plebs, except for some particularly notorious examples
    4. Claudius
      • Good relationship with the plebs - much stronger than the others
      • Executed the people who had killed Caligula
      • Established a civil service in the form of freedmen and brought about agrarian reforms (such as the draining of the Fucine lake) - see administration
      • Claudius also began the conquering of Britain and conquered Mauretania in North Africa, Thrace in the Balkans and Lycia in Turkey, adding them all to the Roman empire
      • His administrative successes (see Administration of Imperial Rome post) such as securing grain and water supply in Rome, were popular measures that should not be overlooked
      • Claudius also lavished largesse and entertainment on the people to secure their loyalty
      • Suetonius - "he very often distributed largesse to the people" + Claudius was innovative and threw some (shows) "of a new kind, and some revived from ancient times, and in places where no one had ever given them before"
      • Restored Pompey's theatre when it was damaged by fire and held games there
      • "He gave many gladiatorial shows and in many places" - he held one annually in the Praetorian camp in celebration of the accession
      • "he would address the audience and invite them to merriment, calling them "masters" from time to time"
      • Dio also surveys Claudius' treatment of different groups in Rome, highlighting not only more positive interactions with the Senate and Equestrians, but his concern that the city must be well administered:
        • "He refused to accept any gifts of money, a thing which had been usual under Augustus and Gaius (Caligula)"
        • He would not allow anyone who had any relatives still living to nominate him as heir
        • All the funds that had been confiscated under Tiberius and Gaius (Caligula) he gave back to the victims themselves, if they were still alive, or othrewise to their children
        • He closed down the taverns where people would meet and drink and issued an edict that no meat or hot water should be sold, and punished some who did not obey. He did this because "he realised that it was pointless to ban the populace from doing something unless it helped to reform their daily habits"
        • He forced those who had been accustomed to performing on the stage during Caligula's reign to appear on the stage. "He did this not because he took any delight in it, but to censure these people for their past conduct"
        • "By such conduct he won so much love and devotion in a short time"
        • His popularity with the plebs is further shown by how the people reacted to a rumour that he had died. The people were "horror-stricken, and with dreadful execrations continued to assail the soldiers as traitors, and the senate as murderers" until it was eventually revealed that he was in fact alive
    5. Nero
      • Poor relationship with the plebs (although during the quinquennium neronis it was pretty good)
      • At the beginning of his reign he put on many shows and spectacles
      • Tacitus - "Soon he actually invited all the people of Rome, who extolled him in their praises like a mob which craves for amusements and rejoices when a prince draws them the same way. However, the public exposure of his shame acted on him as an incentive instead of sickening him, as men expected"
      • Suetonius - "He gave many entertainments of different kinds" Including the Juvenales, chariot races, stage-plays, and gladiatorial shows
      • At the Juvenales, he had old men "of consular rank" and "aged matrons" take part
      • During the chariot races he even matched chariots drawn by four camels
      • Every day "all kinds of presents" were thrown to the people, including "a thousand birds of every kind each day, various kinds of food, tickets for grain, clothes, gold, silver, precious stones, pearls, paintings, slaves, beasts of burden, and even trained wild animals; finally, ships, blocks of houses, and farms"
      • At the start of his reign (during the Quinquennium Neronis), Nero attempted to follow the "principles of Augustus", which included generosity to the plebs
      • Suetonius - "To make his good intentions still more evident, he declared that he would rule according to the principles of Augustus, and he let slip no opportunity for acts of generosity and mercy, or even for displaying his affability"
      • More oppressive sources of revenue were either abolished or moderated
      • He reduced the rewards paid to informers against violators of the Papian law to 1/4 of the former amount
      • He gave 400 sesterces to each man of the people
      • He granted to the most distinguished of the Senators who were without means an annual salary (some even up to 500,000 sesterces)
      • He gave a monthly allowance of grain to the Praetorian cohort for free
      • He exclaimed "How I wish I never learned to write!" when asked to sign a death warrant
      • He allowed the plebs to watch his exercises in the Campus, often spoke in public and read his poems both at home and in the theatre "so greatly to the delight of all that a thanksgiving was voted because of his recital"
      • Nero devised a new way of feeding the people. He changed the banquet system to grain parcels that would be given out at games (Suetonius)
      • However, even the plebs would turn on Nero, largely as a result of his neglect of their wishes, and him profiting from crises where the plebs struggled
      • He was violent and depraved. He would attack people in the street for fun, bar people from leaving performances to the extent that women were giving birth in the audience. He built the Domus Aurea on top of the ruins of people's houses (after the fire) abd had stopped people searching in the rubble of their own property. He also encouraged depravity and debauchery
      • He also had the idea that a gentleman should spend extravagantly, which just made him look like a dick
      • Suetonius - "The bitter feeling against him was increased because he also turned the high cost of grain to his profit, for indeed it so fell out that while the people were suffering from hunger, it was reported that a ship had arrived from Alexandria, bringin sand for court wrestlers"
      • There was also Nero's treatment of the Christians, as well as the Great Fire of Rome, which ultimately hurt the people of Rome the most - the rumours circulating that Nero began the fire would of course damage his relationship with them, and particularly his neglect following the fire and his building of the Domus Aurea (golden house) on the ruins of people's homes showed the plebs that Nero had little care for their wishes or needs
      • On the other hand, Tacitus tells us that after the Great Fire of Rome, Nero opened up his private property to refugees, and that he improved the city afterwards. However, his overall behaviour and cruelty overshadows this
  2. What provisions were made for the people by the emperors? Is Juvenal's claim that the people only desired "bread and circuses" true?